🔗 Share this article

"Half of my experiences is saved on this app, and suddenly they demand us to cover the cost for it."

Negative feedback and a feeling of inequity have taken over social media conversations since Snapchat emerged as the newest tech firm to put a price tag on a function that users previously utilized for at no cost.

The company behind Snapchat declared in September that it would start charging users if they have over five GB of previously shared pictures and clips stored as Memories.

For many, these past uploads act as a portal to bygone days – prompting some to blast the company of "money-hungry tactics" in comments on online platforms and unfavorable ratings on mobile app marketplaces.

Other Choices

Snap has equated its premium storage tiers to those made available by major companies for mobile devices.

For those seeking another option for those who don't want to pay, members can download their Memories – which for many people span significant data – to their personal gadget.

The company stated that only a limited group of subscribers would be affected by the changes.

The company admitted that it was "always challenging to move from accessing content at no charge to subscribing to it" – but proposed it would be "a valuable investment" for users.

Numerous denouncing the change online seem to disagree.

Widespread Discontent

A digital campaign dubbed the cost a "archival levy", with commenters calling it "bleak" and "outrageous" – while a user promised never to use the application from now on.

Meanwhile, in a poor review on the app marketplace, a user calling themselves a pseudonymous user said it felt "deeply unfair".

"If I know millennials right, most of us have a long history of memories on this service," they commented. "And most of us only remained on the platform primarily for that feature. 5GB is absolutely nothing when you have a long timeline of moments... Farewell Snapchat."

Additionally, a journalism student, a young adult journalism student in a major city, shared on the video platform her intention to delete the application.

"I made up my mind that I had to save all my memories as quickly as possible," she stated. "The vast majority of my teenage years have been documented through my Snapchat memories, all of the photos in there are extremely valuable to me."

"This seems illogical to demand payment individuals for a service that has been at no cost for so many years."

Unspecified Pricing

The platform has not yet said how much premium options would be priced at in the UK – only that they are part of a "gradual global rollout".

But a London resident another user, who is based in London, said in a post on the video service that she would be "upset" by such charges.

Amber explained that the platform had become "a regular habit" since she first joined in 2014.

Although she acknowledged she recognized the platform needed to generate revenue, she suggested that the saved content option holds greater significance than the company may have anticipated.

"I think it's a somewhat inequitable decision to impose fees on your users who have been loyal and devoted," she explained. "These are not merely labeled 'Memories', these are our real-life recollections."

Industry Perspective

Companies opting to impose fees from subscribers for a feature that was previously free is a common practice, and millions subscribe to platforms like iCloud and Google Drive to save their photos and videos from their smartphone.

The fact of archiving content in the digital storage – which certain experts in the technology sector like to refer to as essentially "an external server" – is that it requires funding.

"Storing trillions of Memories on the platform isn't a trivial amount," online expert an industry analyst commented. "The company has to try to find a method to cover the cost of archiving, network usage, back-ups, media distribution, security measures – all that stuff."

However the consultant said that requiring payment for a function that had previously been free, and users had been encouraged to use as such, may feel like a "deceptive practice" for many people.

"Moving the goalposts after users have accumulated this huge digital archive doesn't really sit right," he said. And for many, he continued, "Archived media exceeds mere information, they're sentimental records."

The opinion was reflected by those submitting critical reviews, with a user labeling their saved images and clips "deeply important to me".

"These archives contain each part of my life within them from celebrations of new family members' births, grieving for lost relatives, experiences shared with close ones, [and] my whole teenage years," they wrote.

Expert Analysis

An academic expert, a research fellow at a Dutch institution in the Netherlands, explained that Snapchat's move highlights the consequences of business-oriented apps being used to save sentimental personal content.

"Platforms gain from this confidence, connected relationship, and assumption of perpetual availability, which even encourages certain individuals to stay on the service or continue to use it in order to scroll back through their stored media," she informed journalists. "But these are not benevolent guardians of private remembrance."